Greg Bell Greg Bell's Profile Page

Greg Bell Greg Bell

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

一番優秀-信頼的なISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語復習赤本試験-試験の準備方法ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語対策

JPTestKingは正確な選択を与えて、君の悩みを減らして、もし早くてPECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor認証をとりたければ、早くてJPTestKingをショッピングカートに入れましょう。あなたにとても良い指導を確保できて、試験に合格するのを助けって、JPTestKingからすぐにあなたの通行証をとります。

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック
出題範囲

トピック 1

AI 管理システムの要件: 試験のこのセクションでは、主任監査人のスキルを測定し、ISO
IEC 42001 に概説されている主要な要件を理解することに重点が置かれています。組織がコンプライアンス標準を効果的に満たすために、AI 関連の活動とプロセスをどのように構築すべきかを説明します。

トピック 2

ISO
IEC 42001監査プログラムの管理：この試験セクションでは、AIコンプライアンス担当者のスキルを評価し、監査プログラム全体の監督について扱います。複数の監査の管理、監査パフォーマンスの追跡、そして監査結果をAIガバナンスに関連するより広範な組織目標と整合させることが含まれます。

トピック 3

ISO
IEC 42001監査の終了：このセクションでは、AIコンプライアンス担当者のスキルを評価し、監査プロセスを完了する方法を説明します。監査結果の報告、不適合の管理、継続的な改善とコンプライアンスを確保するためのフォローアップの実施などが含まれます。

>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語復習赤本 <<

信頼的なPECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語復習赤本 & 合格スムーズISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語対策 | 素敵なISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor復習テキスト

テストISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorの認定に合格すると、あなたの就労能力が社会から認められ、良い仕事を見つけることができます。 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorクイズトレントを習得して試験に合格した場合。同僚、上司、親relative、友人、社会から尊敬されます。総じて、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorテスト準備を購入すると、試験に合格するだけでなく、キャリアと将来についての夢を実現するのに役立ちます。ですから、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験の教材を購入してすぐに行動を起こすことをheしないでください。

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam 認定 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 試験問題 (Q103-Q108):

質問 # 103
Question:
During a combined audit, if an auditor identifies a finding linked to one criterion, should they consider its potential impact on corresponding or related criteria of other management systems?

A. Yes, the auditor should consider the possible impact on the corresponding or similar criteria of the other management system
B. Yes, the auditor should consider the other criteria only if the finding is deemed significant
C. No, in such cases the auditor should always focus on the specific criterion identified

正解：A

解説：
In acombined audit, auditors are required toconsider the implications of a finding across different but related management systems.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.2.2states:"Findings should be evaluated not only against the specific audit criteria but also their relevance to other applicable requirements in combined audits."
* TheLead Auditor Training Manualclarifies:"In combined audits, findings must be reviewed for their potential cross-system impacts to ensure full system-wide conformity." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.2.2; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide, Combined Audit Considerations.

質問 # 104
Scenario 4 (continued):
BioNovaPharm, a German biopharmaceutical company, has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMSbased on ISO/IEC 42001 to optimize various aspects of drug discovery, including analyzing extensive biological data, identifying potentialdrug candidates, and streamlining clinical trial processes. After having the AIMS in place for over a year, the company contracted acertification body and is now undergoing an AIMS audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
Adopting a risk-based approach, the audit team focused on risk throughout their activities. The level of detail outlined in the audit plancorresponded to the scope and complexity of the audit. The team employed a ranking system for detailed audit procedures, prioritizingthose with the highest risk.
Once the stage 1 audit began, the audit team started reviewing the auditee's documented information. To assess whether BioNovaPharmcomplies with the legal and regulatory requirements related to incident communication, the audit team examined evidence provided bythe company's external legal office. The evidence confirmed that BioNovaPharm applies the requirements of the EU Al Act, whichmandates that providers of high-risk Al systems report serious incidents to relevant authorities.
Following the completion of the stage 1 audit, John, an audit team member, documented the stage 1 audit outputs, including theobservations of the audit team that could result in nonconformities during the on-site audit. However, the audit team leader, Emma, whowas overseeing the audit activities, observed that John failed to document significant observations related to the lack of transparency inthe Al decision-making processes of BioNovaPharm. Considering that Emma observed John's lack of competence in undertaking some audit activities, a disciplinary note was recorded for John.
Question:
Based on Scenario 4, does the level of detail in the audit plan adequately reflect all aspects recommended for a comprehensive risk-based approach to planning?

A. No, the audit plan should have focused on nonconformities only
B. No, detailed audit procedures should have been prioritized based on the level of risk, from lowest to highest
C. Yes, the amount of detail provided in the audit plan reflects all the necessary aspects
D. No, the audit plan should have included sufficient detail correlating with the risk of not achieving the audit objectives

正解：D

解説：
The audit plan should correlate directly withthe risk of not achieving the audit objectives, meaning higher- risk areas need more scrutiny.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1 and ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 9.2.1 emphasize that audit planning must berisk-based, addressing critical risk areas sufficiently to meet audit objectives.
* Lead Auditor TrainingModule 3 highlights:"An audit plan must be sufficiently detailed based on risks to ensure critical activities receive proportionate audit attention." Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.1; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1.

質問 # 105
Scenario 9 (continued):
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewingSecurisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and uphold its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
Roger followed up on action plans after the external audit at Securisai, but he was directly involved in strategic decision-making processes, potentially affecting his audit objectivity.
Question:
Based on Scenario 9, which principle of internal auditing did Roger violate?

A. Independence
B. Integrity
C. Objectivity

正解：A

解説：
Independenceis compromised when an auditor has direct involvement in the management or decision-making processes of the system being audited.
* ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 4.5defines independence as:"The basis for the impartiality and objectivity of the audit conclusions."
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5reinforces that personnel auditing must be free from involvement in the area audited.
* By participating in strategic decision-making, Roger violated the independence principle.
Reference:ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 4.5; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5.

質問 # 106
Question:
What does sampling error refer to in the context of the audit?

A. The auditor's bias in selecting samples that reflect personal expectations rather than random selection
B. The discrepancy between the auditor's findings from a selected sample and the true conditions of the entire population
C. The systematic selection of samples from only specific parts of the population, presumed to be more compliant

正解：B

解説：
Sampling erroris defined as thedifference between the findings from a selected sample and the actual full population's characteristics.
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.5.5:"Sampling error is an unavoidable uncertainty in audit results arising from evaluating only part of the population."
* This differs from bias (A) or systematic exclusion (C), which are forms of samplingbias, noterror.
Reference:ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.5.5; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Training Module 6 ("Audit Sampling and Risk").

質問 # 107
Question:
Can the work assignments of audit team members be changed during the audit?

A. Yes, changes can be made to ensure the achievement of audit objectives
B. Yes, but only if the changes are approved by the auditee
C. No, changes cannot be made once the audit starts

正解：A

解説：
Yes,audit team assignments can be adjustedduring the audit to ensure the audit remains effective and objective.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.4.1states:"The audit team leader shall reassign tasks as necessary during the audit to ensure audit objectives are achieved."
* TheISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.9similarly permits dynamic reassignment of roles based on real-time findings or logistical needs.The auditee's permission is not required unless changes impact the audit scope or confidentiality agreements.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.4.1; ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.9.

質問 # 108
......

適切なトレーニングを選ぶのは成功の保証になれますが、何を選ぶのは非常に重要なことです。JPTestKingはとても人気がありますから、それを選ばない理由はないです。もちろん、完璧なトレーニング資料を差し上げましたが、もしあなたに向いていないのなら無用になりますから、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor問題集を利用する前に、一部の問題と解答を無料にダウンロードしてみることができます。そうしたら、完全な試験準備をして、気楽に試験を受かることができるようになります。それも何千何万の受験生がJPTestKingを選んだ重要な理由です。JPTestKingは一番よい、一番実用的な、一番完全なISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験トレーニング資料を提供していますから、受験生たちが試験を準備することに意重要な助けになります。

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語対策: https://www.jptestking.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-exam.html

Greg Bell Greg Bell

Biography

Resources

Social Links